Legal Opinion

State v. Cienfuegos

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2001No. 70003-6PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

— Guillermo Cienfuegos was convicted of escape. The primary issue raised by Cienfuegos in his appeal is whether counsel’s failure to request a diminished capacity instruction was ineffective assistance of counsel. He also contends that Washington State’s system for jury pool selection is unconstitutional and failed to provide an ethnically representative jury panel. We hold that he has failed to meet the requirements to prevail on either contention and affirm his conviction.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Cienfuegos has the unenviable credential of being a long time drug user. He started taking drugs as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API