Legal Opinion
Didlake v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 16, 2015No. 71633-6-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Leach, J.
Washington’s implied consent statute, RCW 46.20.308, requires that a driver arrested for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) pay a filing fee to obtain an administrative review hearing to prevent a driver’s license suspension or revocation. James Didlake, Dustin Johnson, Shelly Burke, Monica Fischer, and Michael Bennett (collectively Didlake) appeal a trial court decision that this “fee for hearing” requirement does not violate procedural due process. Because the driving privilege is not a fundamental right and the Department of Licensing (Department) waives the fee…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Grocery Manufacturers AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Arthur West v. Tesc Board Of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Megan Roake v. Maxwell DelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington, V. Turner Lee CallowayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.