State v. Gatling
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHusKiNS, J.
Within four hours after the victim was beaten and robbed, defendants were apprehended and brought to the county jail. The victim, already there, promptly recognized defendants and identified them as his assailants. He so testified at the trial and over objection made an in-court identification of the robbers. Defendants contend this violated their constitutional right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the presence of counsel at such a “pretrial confrontation.” Admission of this evidence is assigned as error, defendants relying on United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 18 L. ed 2d…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.