Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Beekman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action of replevin by John D. Beekman, against David Ridenour, Harrison Gilbert and Abbey Ridenour, and such proceedings were had as that judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against all the defendants.

Errors are assigned in the names of David Ridenour and Harrison Gilbert alone, as appellants, not noticing Abbey Ridenour, but notice has been served upon her of the appeal by her codefendants, as required by section 551 of the code. The errors are therefore well enough assigned in the names of those who appeal.

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal on this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Holliday v. McKinneSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Maxwell v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bohr v. NeuenschwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Field v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Higbee v. RodemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API