Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Vaughn
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1984No. B006023PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
Defendant Keith Vaughn appeals from the judgment entered in this declaratory relief action in favor of plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. He challenges the trial court’s determination “[t]hat the 1982 Legislative Amendment to California Insurance Code Section 11580.1 (c)(5) merely clarified existing law permitting indirect inter family indemnity exclusions from policies of automobile liability insurance coverage rather than changed the pre-1982 law on this subject; [and] [t]hat, accordingly, no retroactive] effect is being given to the 1982 amendment. .…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Fla. Farm Bureau Ins. v. Government Emp. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Parker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SuarezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Minners v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- American Psychometric Consultants, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Ohrbach's, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996