Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P.J.
The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna), Manitowoc Clinic, Inc. and Manitowoc Clinic, S.C. appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Kossuth Mutual Insurance Company (Kossuth), the third party defendant-respondent. Aetna maintains that the family exclusion clause in the Rabases' insurance policy only applies to direct action claims and therefore does not apply to this indirect claim for contribution. Because we conclude that the family exclusion clause applies to direct and indirect actions against insured family members, we affirm the trial court's order for summary judgment.
On June…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Borchardt v. WilkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Kafka v. PopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dartez v. Atlas Assurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996