Legal Opinion
Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 12, 2017No. 2016-1789PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the Court of International Trade (“CIT”) affirming the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results in the eighth administrative review of the anti-dumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India. Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United States, 144 F.Supp.3d 1308 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2016); see also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 79 Fed. Reg. 51,309 (Dep’t Commerce Aug. 28, 2014) (final administrative review). Using the “average-to-transaction” methodology with zeroing, Commerce assessed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. And National Steel Corporation and Geneva Steel Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Laclede Steel Company Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Dofasco, Inc., and Uss-Posco Industries, and Ipsco, Inc., and Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Thyssen Stahl Ag and Stelco, Inc., and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Algoma Steel Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., Kern-Liebers Usa, Inc., and Bethlehem Steel Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. National Steel Corporation and United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation, and Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nkk Corporation Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Sidbec-Dosco, Inc., and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. And Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Voest Alpine Stahl Ag, and Ilva, S.P.A., and Siderar S.A.I.C., the Successor of Propulsora Siderurgica S.A.I.C. And Aceros Parana, S.A.I.C., and Stelco, Inc., and Dofasco, Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Empresa Nacional Siderurgica, S.A. And Algoma Steel Inc., and Worthington Industries, Inc. Ilva Usa, Inc. And Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Thyssen Stahl Ag Thyssen Steel Detroit Co. Thyssen Inc. Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag, Defendants/cross-Appellants, and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Stupp Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Posco v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Dillinger France S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.