Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
The Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) selected two exporters, Jacobi Carbons AB (“Jacobi”) and Calgon Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. (“CCT”), to individually examine in the third administrative review of an antidumping order. Commerce assigned both exporters de minimis dumping margins. Rather than using the “expected method” of averaging those de minimis margins to' calculate a separate rate for non-examined exporters Ningxia Guan-ghua Cherishmet' Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (“Cherishmet”), 1 ' Shanxi DMD Corp. (“Shanxi”), and' Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Company Ltd.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.