Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Beale

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 8, 2009No. 6:07-cr-06219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Derrick Coleman, appearing pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), asserts claims under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution against two defendants, Beth Beale and James Coates, who at all relevant times were an alcohol and substance abuse treatment (“ASAT”) program assistant and a correction counselor at the Orleans Correctional Facility.

Defendants have moved for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washington v. AfifyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
  2. Morales v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  3. Reynolds v. BarrettDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  4. Crenshaw v. HartmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  5. Johnson v. AnnucciDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API