Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Barrett
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 4, 2010No. 99-CV-6228L, 99-CV-6503L, 00-CV-6436L, 00-CV-6440LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
These four cases arise out of alleged racial discrimination against inmates at the Elmira Correctional Facility, which is operated by the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) in Elmira, New York. The four African-American plaintiffs, Jerry Reynolds, Khalib Gould, Anthony Mack, and Joseph Ponder, all of whom were at all relevant times incarcerated at Elmira, allege that they were subjected to discrimination on account of their race in connection with their inmate jobs in the Print Shop at Elmira. Plaintiffs assert claims…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reynolds v. Barrett Gould v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Richard v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Washington v. AfifyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
- Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.