Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 17, 2019No. C082826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRenner, J.

*589Plaintiff Wendell Brown sued his employer, the City of Sacramento (City), for racial discrimination and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). ( Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq. ) A jury returned a verdict in Brown's favor. The City moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. The trial court granted the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in part, finding that Brown failed to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to some of the *590acts found to be retaliatory. The trial court denied the motion with respect to other acts…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. James D. O'COnnOr Jeannette C. O'COnnOr v. City of Newark City of Newark Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Li v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  2. Lurner v. American Golf Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. SwiftAir v. Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. WiFi Rail, Inc. v. S.F. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Young v. County of Los Angeles CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API