Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 2018No. CR–17–613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda k. Wood, Associate Justice

Appellant James Gray, Jr., appeals from the denial of a pro se petition for a writ of error coram nobis wherein he alleged that his guilty plea was not voluntarily or intelligently entered with the assistance of competent counsel. Pending before this court is Gray's motion for an extension of time to file his appellate brief. An appeal from an order that denied a petition for postconviction relief, including a petition for writ of error coram nobis, will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. See Brown v. State , 2017 Ark. 232, at 2, 522 S.W.3d…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. State v. Tejeda-AcostaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Baptist Health Med. Sys. v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Redus v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Osburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Eddie L. Pugh v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Conray Carroll v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Ralph Malone v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API