Legal Opinion

State v. Tejeda-Acosta

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 2013No. CR-12-903PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

_[^Appellant, the State of Arkansas, appeals the order of the Benton County Circuit Court granting Appellee Francisco Daniel Tejeda-Acosta’s petition for writ of error coram nobis and vacating his guilty pleas and sentence. The State’s sole point for reversal is that the circuit court erred as a matter of law by expanding the grounds for a writ of error coram nobis to include claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We conclude that, despite the circuit court’s effort to stay within the bounds of established grounds for coram-nobis relief, the result of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Philyaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API