Redus v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice
On June 7, 2018, petitioner Xavier Redus filed in the trial court a pro se petition to correct an illegal sentence under Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-111 (Repl. 2016). The trial court denied the petition. Redus did not timely file a notice of appeal, and now before us is his pro se motion for rule on clerk seeking to proceed with the appeal. As the notice of appeal was untimely, we treat the motion as a motion for belated appeal. Latham v. State , 2018 Ark. 44, 2018 WL 897481.
We need not consider Redus's reasons for not filing a timely notice of appeal because it is clear from the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Swift v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Van Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lee Charles Millsap, Jr. v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Darren Woodruff v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- Oscar Willingham v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
- Henry Alexander Harmon v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023
- Shawn Trevell Rainer v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.