Legal Opinion
American Home Fire Assur. v. Hargrove
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1940No. Nos. 1921, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
These were two separate suits, each to recover on an insurance policy insuring against loss by fire certain property near Enid, Oklahoma. The holder of a mortgage covering the insured premises intervened. The ownership, of the property, the issuance of the policies and payment of the premium, the destruction by fire while such policies were in effect, and the existence of the mortgage were not in controversy. The cases were consolidated for trial, and the only issue of fact was whether the requirement for the making of verified proof of loss had been waived. Judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Commercial Union Assur. Co., Limited v. ShultsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. BooherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. TokyoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Aetna Ins. v. RallsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Jones Stevedoring Co. v. Nippo Kisen Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Sandoval v. Mitsui SempakuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.