Commercial Union Assur. Co., Limited v. Shults
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McQurtain County; James B. Armstrong, Judge. Action by G. W. Shults against the Commercial Union Assurance Company, Limited, of London, England. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HAEEISON, C.
This action was upon a fire insurance policy for $1,090. The policy covered a small store building, together with the stock of merchandise and fixtures which were destroyed by fire in January, 1909. The cause was tried in September, 1910, resulting in 'a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,040. Plaintiff thereupon filed a remillilur of $90, which was allowed by the court and judgment rendered for $950. From this judgment the insurance company appealed.
A number of errors are assigned by plaintiff in error as grounds for reversal, among which are: That the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Indiana Insurance v. CapehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bank of Chelsea v. School Dist. No. 1, Rogers Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- American Home Fire Assur. v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.