Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1972No. 71-1699PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:
On the evening of September 10, 1960, Leopoldo Sandoval and his fellow Panama Canal Company employees boarded Mitsui’s vessel AKIBASAN MARU shortly after the vessel began her northbound transit of the Panama Canal. No vessel may transit the Canal *1165without the Canal Company’s pilot and linehandling crew, unless special permission is granted by the Canal Company. 35 C.F.R. § 109.4.1 At the time of Sandoval’s injury, the AKIBASAN MARU was being prepared by the Canal Company to pass through the Pedro Miguel Locks. The vessel was to be guided by mechanical towing mules or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Noritake Co., Inc. v. M/v Hellenic ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Britt v. Corporacion Peruana de VaporesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Donaldson v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1978
- Ocean Barge Transport Co. v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.