Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1972No. 71-1699PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
460 F.2d 1163
17 A.L.R.Fed. 479
Leopoldo SANDOVAL, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, and
Panama Canal Company, Intervenor-Appellee-Cross Appellant,
v.
MITSUI SEMPAKU K. K. TOKYO, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.
No. 71-1699.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
May 23, 1972.
Rehearing Denied June 16, 1972.
E. J. Berger, Cristobal, Canal Zone, Jacob Rassner, New York City, for appellee-appellant.
Woodrow De Castro, Balboa, Canal Zone, Winston Edward Rice, New Orleans, La., for Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo; Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., and Kirlin, Campbell &…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ranger Insurance Company v. William R. Algie and Edith A. AlgieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Sommer Corporation v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973