Park v. Park
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Park appeals a superior court order granting custody of his daughters to Tara Park, their mother. Under AS 25.24.150(c), a court determining child custody must consider a number of specified factors relating to the best interests of the child. Here, the superior court expressly addressed only one of these statutory factors in its finding's and did not clearly indicate that it had considered any others. Because the court’s findings are incomplete and do not fully explain its decision, we hold that they fail to comply with AS 25.24.150(c). We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Duffus v. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- I.J.D. v. D.R.D.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by24 opinions
- Virgin v. VirginAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Smith v. WeekleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Thomas v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Brandal v. ShanginAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.