Legal Opinion

Park v. Park

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1999No. S-8700PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael Park appeals a superior court order granting custody of his daughters to Tara Park, their mother. Under AS 25.24.150(c), a court determining child custody must consider a number of specified factors relating to the best interests of the child. Here, the superior court expressly addressed only one of these statutory factors in its finding's and did not clearly indicate that it had considered any others. Because the court’s findings are incomplete and do not fully explain its decision, we hold that they fail to comply with AS 25.24.150(c). We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Duffus v. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. I.J.D. v. D.R.D.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Virgin v. VirginAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Smith v. WeekleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Thomas v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Brandal v. ShanginAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API