Legal Opinion

Smith v. Weekley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2003No. S-10600PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action for child custody, the superi- or court awarded interim custody to the father and later adopted the interim custody arrangement as the final one. The mother contests this decision, maintaining that the court applied an incorrect standard in reaching its final custody determination and considered one statutory best interests factor to the exclusion of all others. Because we agree that the superior court failed to apply the correct standard to its child custody determination and that it erroneously applied the statutory best interests…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Barrett v. AlguireAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Deivert v. OseiraAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Silvan v. AlcinaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rego v. RegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Jaymot v. Skillings-DonatAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API