Legal Opinion

Virgin v. Virgin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1999No. S-8686PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Joseph Virgin appeals the superior court’s interim orders and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered in connection with its decree of divorce. Because we conclude that the superior court did not abuse its discretion with respect to any of its findings, conclusions, or orders, we affirm them in their entirety.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In September 1997, after nineteen years of marriage, Kathey Virgin filed for a divorce from her husband, Joseph Virgin. Along with her complaint, Kathey filed a motion for interim relief under AS 25.24.140. The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Marriage of Kohler v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. C.L. v. P.C.S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API