Legal Opinion
Baumann v. Harrison
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1941No. Civ. No. 2747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, J.,
pro tem. — In the month of May, 1930, H. O. Harrison and Daisy Harrison, husband and wife, made, executed and delivered to the Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association of California, trustee, in favor of Lane Mortgage Company, a corporation, as beneficiary, a deed of trust upon certain real estate therein specifically described and commonly known as the Commercial Club Building at Eleventh and Broadway, in the city of Los Angeles, California. The deed of trust was duly recorded. It secured a series of 225 promissory notes in various amounts aggregating $500,000, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Haase v. Central Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Messer v. Tait's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Faris v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Turner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Baker Divide Mining Co. v. MaxfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Baumann v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975