OSCAR MAYER & COMPANY v. United States
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
This action involves new rates which reduced the tariff for the shipment of meat and packinghouse products from the midwest and southwest to New Mexico, Arizona, and California. Plaintiffs, two motor carriers and two packing houses, seek to set aside and enjoin two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereafter referred to as the “Commission”) which vacated an earlier Commission order suspending the effective date of the new rates.1
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION
The Trans-Continental Freight Bureau, as agent for various rail carriers, filed with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
- Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- National Water Carriers Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
- Port of New York Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.