Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1991No. 90-1256PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The commission challenges the appellate court’s decision to return this cause to the commission for additional consideration of claimant’s *195entitlement to permanent total disability compensation and lump-sum payment. For the reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment below.

The commission’s order granting permanent total disability compensation did not discuss claimant’s retirement nor did it explain what nonmedical factors persuaded the commission to find claimant permanently and totally disabled. While the latter deficiency generally warrants a return to the commission for an amended order, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus.Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Blake v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Navistar, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API