Legal Opinion
Rice v. Tissaw
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1941No. Civ. No. 4310PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
Paul Tissaw, plaintiff, brought suit against Hal W. Rice, E. C. Houle, R. D. Kennedy, Charles W. Sechrist, E. W. Phillips and W. W. Watkins, defendants, for damages. The case was tried to the court sitting with a jury and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $2,000 actual, and $4,000 punitive, damages, whereupon this appeal was taken.
Plaintiff’s counsel admitted in oral argument that the complaint was not a model of pleading, and we agree with him. As well as we can determine from a careful examination thereof, it alleges in substance as follows: On August 3, 1937, plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Cole v. Town of MiamiArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Butler v. RuleArizona Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H. Keating, Jr., Resolution Trust Corporation v. Mary Elaine Keating Charles H. Keating, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- City of Eveleth v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.