Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Phoenix National Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1937No. Civil No. 3748PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Maricopa county, wherein Frank Stewart was plaintiff and Phoenix National Bank, a corporation, was defendant. The facts which led np to the appeal may be stated as follows:

Plaintiff, by his complaint, sought to recover damages for a loss alleged to have been sustained through the fraudulent foreclosure of a mortgage given by him to defendant as security for an original indebtedness of some $17,000. The defendant filed a motion to strike, one to make more definite and certain, a plea in bar, and a general demurrer. The court denied the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Craemer v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API