Legal Opinion
Butler v. Rule
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1926No. Civil No. 2422PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— The plaintiff, claiming that her intestate came to her death by reason of a negligent and unskillful X-ray treatment, administered by defendant, brought this action for* damages. In her complaint she relied upon five grounds of negligence, as follows:
“(1) That defendant administered said treatment to decedent without first determining decedent’s susceptibility thereto, by reason of which said treatment was too strong and too severe;
“(2) That the tube and bulb of said machine was placed too close to decedent’s body;
“(3) That proper covering and protection was not given decedent’s abdomen,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edington v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Runyan v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hamilton v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.