Legal Opinion

Butler v. Rule

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1926No. Civil No. 2422PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— The plaintiff, claiming that her intestate came to her death by reason of a negligent and unskillful X-ray treatment, administered by defendant, brought this action for* damages. In her complaint she relied upon five grounds of negligence, as follows:

“(1) That defendant administered said treatment to decedent without first determining decedent’s susceptibility thereto, by reason of which said treatment was too strong and too severe;
“(2) That the tube and bulb of said machine was placed too close to decedent’s body;
“(3) That proper covering and protection was not given decedent’s abdomen,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Edington v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Runyan v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Hamilton v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API