Legal Opinion

Miller v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. C91-0166-W-G-12; CA A74128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of the Columbia River Gorge Commission’s denial of their application to divide a parcel of property and to construct a residence on the newly created portion. See 16 USC § 544 et seq; ORS ch 196. We affirm.

In their first assignment, petitioners challenge the Commission’s decision on its merits. There was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision and it properly applied the law. In their second assignment, petitioners contend that the denial amounted to the taking of a scenic easement in their property and, therefore, constituted a taking without just…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Joyce v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Scott v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Dodd v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Murray v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Lardy v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API