Legal Opinion
Dodd v. Hood River County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 9, 1992No. LUBA 91-116; CA A73984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner Oregonians In Action and cross-petitioners Dodd 1 seek review of LUBA’s decision affirming Hood River County’s denial of cross-petitioners’ application for a conditional use permit and related approvals to build a single family dwelling in a forestry zone. We affirm.
Petitioner and cross-petitioners assign error to LUBA’s conclusion that the denial did not give rise to a taking under Article I, section 18, of the Oregon Constitution. 2 The county denied the application, because it concluded that the proposed dwelling did not satisfy the approval standard in its ordinance that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Dodd v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dodd v. Hood River CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Nelson v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Miller v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.