Legal Opinion

Murray v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1993No. C91-0213-W-G-12; CA A78603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner Murray seeks review of the order of the Columbia River Gorge Commission (commission) denying his application to build a road on and to subdivide a 37-acre parcel in an agricultural area subject to the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act (act). 16 USC §§ 544 etseq\ see ORS 196.115. We affirm.

Petitioner’s first assignment includes numerous arguments, but all of them hinge on his assertion that the commission erred by treating his application as one for a subdivision, rather than simply an application to build a road. The application states, in part:

“Proposed Project…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Rodriguez v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API