Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 1994No. 14748-3-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petrich, J. *

— Tom Tucker appeals from a decision of the Skamania County Superior Court affirming a denial of his application to subdivide real property located in the Columbia River Gorge Scenic Area. Tucker sought to subdivide four 10-acre parcels of land into eight 5-acre parcels.

In 1986, Congress passed the "Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act” (Act). Its purpose was(1) to establish a national scenic area to protect and provide for the enhancement of the scenic, cultural, recreational, and natural resources of the Columbia River Gorge; and(2) to protect and support the economy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hayes v. YountWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Narrowsview Preservation Ass'n v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Heidgerken v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Boehm v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Boehm v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API