Legal Opinion

State v. Grullon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1989No. 13453PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

This appeal raises three principal issues: the validity of a conviction based upon a unilateral conspiracy, the admissibility of a warrant-less wiretap procured with the consent of one of the parties, and the constitutionality of a statutory exemption for drug dependent persons. A jury found the defendant, Pedro Grullon, guilty on one count of possession of cocaine with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a) and one count of conspiracy to possess and transport cocaine with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-277…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. TomaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API