Ruzic v. Ruzic
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order denying the parties’ post-trial motions for amended findings in an action for dissolution of marriage.1 Both the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband contend that the trial court abused its discretion in its distribution of the property acquired during the. marriage and in its award of alimony to appellant. Respondent objects also to the award to appellant for her attorneys fees. We affirm.
Although respondent has challenged the findings with respect to the ownership and value of some of the property as lacking evidentiary support, our review of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Cashman v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by41 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Otis v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Johns v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Otte v. OtteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.