Legal Opinion

Dietlin v. General American Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1935No. S. F. 15435PublishedCited by 32 opinions

(Two consolidated cases.)

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

At the time this cause was taken over we were in disagreement with only a portion of the opinion filed herein by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One. We therefore adopt as and for the decision of this court, the following portions of the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Held, sitting pro tempore with the District Court of Appeal:

“Missouri State Life Insurance Company, a corporation, issued to plaintiff and appellant three policies of insurance, each providing for disability payments. One of these policies we designate herein as the ‘accident policy’, and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wilkinson v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. of DetroitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Dietlin v. Missouri State Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Austero v. National Casualty Co. of DetroitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Dillon v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API