Legal Opinion

J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1979No. TC 33303, CA 10910, SC 26250PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

This is an action for damages asserted under ORS 30.260 to 30.300 (Tort Actions Against Public Bodies). After a jury had been empanelled the trial judge sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint. The Court of Appeals reversed, J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton, 39 Or App 743, 593 P2d 1231 (1979), and we granted review, ORS 2.520, 286 Or 745 (1979). We have since concluded on our own motion that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction of the cause and that it must be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

After argument on the demurrer the trial judge orally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lulay v. EarleOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ThreetOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mangus v. Progress Quarries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API