Legal Opinion

Longee v. Carter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1978No. A7712, 18389, SC 25627PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon our own motion, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction 1 in this court because the order from which the appeal is taken is not an appealable order. Our appellate jurisdiction is limited, springing, as it does, from statute. Smallwood v. Erlandson, 281 Or 699, 576 P2d 374 (1978); Andrysek v. Andrysek, 280 Or 61, 569 P2d 615 (1977); Lulay v. Earle, Wolfer, 278 Or 511, 564 P2d 1045 (1977).

Facts and Procedural Background

On February 24,1972, defendant Longee (hereinafter "defendant”) executed a promissory note to plaintiff for $524.42 plus interest. On November 16, 1976, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lulay v. EarleOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Andrysek v. AndrysekOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lecher v. St. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Smallwood v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of DaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mangus v. Progress Quarries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API