Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 13, 1991No. 90-356PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
The Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology suspended appellant’s psychologist license for having violated Rule 6(a) of the Psychologists Code of Ethics, which the Board adopted pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 17-96-203(5) (1987). The circuit court affirmed that part of the Board’s decision finding she had sexual relations with her client in violation of Rule 6(a). She appeals that decision by challenging (1) the constitutionality of Rule 6(a) as being vague, arbitrary and violative of her rights of due process, and (2) the Board’s finding that sufficient evidence existed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jack J. Bender v. William P. Clark, as Successor to James G. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Green v. CarderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Muhammed v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Anonymous v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- C.C.B. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.