Legal Opinion

Schmelzer v. Condit

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1920No. 9924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to enjoin the foreclosure of a mortgage on mining property. Judgment for defendants. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of San Juan County, Hon. W. N. Searcy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Plaintiff in error brought suit against defendants in error to enjoin them from foreclosing a mortgage upon her interest in certain mining claims.

On the trial of the cause the court found for the defendants, and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff in error now asks that the judgment be superseded and that a temporary injunction, which was vacated by said judgment, be continued in force pending the determination of the cause in this court.

The suit grew out of a transaction between plaintiff in error and defendant in error, Condit, in which she submitted to Condit the following proposition…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheyenne Mountain School District 12 v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Ryan v. Fitzpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Fenimore v. StauderColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Rockwell v. MOUNTAIN VIEW ELECTRIC ASS'N, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API