Legal Opinion

Columbian Fuel Corporation v. Skidmore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 5, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming in part, reversing in part.

By a parol contract the Columbian Fuel Corporation employed H. L. Skidmore to drill a gas well for $2.40 per foot. This was the extent of the express contract. Skidmore had previously drilled a number of wells for the corporation, and it may be assumed that the parties understood the necessary details. It is not controverted that the contract was for a completed well,'as might be determined by the company. Nor is the legal implication of reasonable skill and care and proper workmanship questioned. The evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Lee Farm Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Holiday Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. R.R. Comm'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Corbin Oil & Gas Co. v. MullCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LK Comstock & Co., Inc. v. Becon Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1993
  2. Ryan v. Fitzpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Raymond E. Fontaine Trust v. P & J Resources, Inc. (In re P & J Resources, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
  4. D.W. Wilburn, Inc. v. H&H Painting, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. R2HS Holdings, LLC v. Annestes Farms, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API