Legal Opinion

Friebel v. Visiting Nurse Assn. of Mid-Ohio (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2014No. 2013-0892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Connor, CJ.

{¶ 1} In this appeal we address whether the doctrine of dual intent or dual purpose is applicable when determining eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits in Ohio. We hold that it is not. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and judgment.

Relevant Background

{¶ 2} Beginning in November 2006, appellee, Tamara Friebel, was employed by appellant Visiting Nurse Association of Mid-Ohio (‘VNA”) as a home health nurse to provide in-home health-care services to VNA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jackson v. Kings IslandOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Piazza v. Cuyahoga Cty. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. McAlpine v. McCloudOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Calet v. E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Hicks v. Safelite Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Lang v. THK Mfg. of Am., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API