Legal Opinion
State v. Hensel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1988No. Cr. 870187PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Defendant David Daniel Hensel appeals from a judgment of conviction of possession of a controlled substance (psilocybin) in violation of Section 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C., possession of less than one-half ounce of marijuana in violation of Section 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C., and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Section 12.1-31.1-03, N.D.C.C. 1 Hensel entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., which allows a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty if the defendant prevails on appeal to this Court.
After Hensel was arrested for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. DowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HaverlukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GilbertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.