Legal Opinion

Madden v. Estin

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 20, 1990No. 89-P-608PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.

This case grew out of the following sequence of events, which we draw from materials submitted on cross motions for summary judgment. Under a written purchase and sale agreement dated August 7, 1979, the plaintiff (Madden) agreed to buy from two trustees (hereafter Estin) residential property in Manchester, Massachusetts, for a price of $320,000. Madden paid .a $15,500 deposit. The agreement provided that time was of the essence and called for a closing date of September 12, 1979. There was a mortgage contingency clause which provided that if Madden could not obtain financing (after diligent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Godbout v. CousensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Ourfalian v. Aro Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. USTrust v. Henley & Warren Management, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. Medeiros v. Middlesex InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Churgin v. HobbieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API