Legal Opinion

Medeiros v. Middlesex Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 5, 1999No. 97-P-1053PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

At all times material hereto, the plaintiff, Brenda Medeiros, resided with her boyfriend, James Egan, in a home they owned jointly in Hyannis. David Drinon, an insurance agent undisputedly acting as agent of the defendant insurer, Middlesex Insurance Company, represented to the plaintiff, who frequently drove Egan’s automobile, that “in order to be properly insured” she was required to be listed as an additional operator on Egan’s motor vehicle liability policy issued by the insurer and that she would then receive the same coverage as Egan. The policy promised to pay damages caused by an *52unins…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Professional Services Group, Inc. v. Town of RocklandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Kanamaru v. Holyoke Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Women First OB/GYN Associates, L.L.C. v. HarrisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Kirschbaum v. WennettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. StrojnyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API