USTrust v. Henley & Warren Management, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Although the defendant has, with its appeal, served up a six-volume record that describes a moderately complex financial “workout” transaction, at bottom the question is whether a prior conversation about the terms of the workout can vary or amplify the terms contained in detailed *338written instruments negotiated with the assistance of counsel. A judge of the Superior Court thought not, and we affirm.
We first sketch the facts of the workout to give an introduction to the business context of the case. Thereafter, we shall describe with more precision the terms of the workout and the important…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Antonellis v. Northgate Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Chambers v. Gold Medal Bakery, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Fusco v. Rocky Mountain I Investments Limited PartnershipMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Realty Finance Holdings, LLC v. KS Shiraz Manager, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.