Legal Opinion
Jianqing Wu v. Special Counsel, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-0376PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Pro se Plaintiff Jianqing Wu, a native Mandarin speaker, is an educated man, having earned three separate graduate degrees over the years, including a J.D. and a Ph.D. Perhaps, he alleges, too educated, as he contends that Defendants ALTA, Hire Counsel, Special Counsel, Morrison & Foerster, and Wilkie Farr & Gallagher all denied him employment as a contract attorney on the basis of his age — because his experience would have made him too expensive — and because of his race and national origin — because they preferred people…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lurensky v. WellinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Fillmore v. AT & T Mobility Services LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Hill v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Arnold v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.