Legal Opinion
Fillmore v. AT & T Mobility Services LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-0661PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge
Pro se Plaintiff Brian David Fillmore worked for Defendant AT & T Mobility-Services LLC for nearly three years between early 2011 and his termination in early 2014. He has filed suit against both AT & T and his union, CWA Local 2336, asserting separate claims of age discrimination against each. Although AT & T has not yet been served, the union now moves to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice, arguing that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Agreeing that his allegations against the union are insufficient,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Samuel v. Wells Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Washington, Jr. v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Washington v. Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Wood v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Baker v. Google LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.