Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Carter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 9, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2207PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Pro se Plaintiff Marvin Arnold worked as a social worker for the U.S.-Army. He brought this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, alleging principally that he was unfairly deprived of a promotion and constructively discharged. Denying such discrimination, the Secretary of the Army now moves to dismiss the suit. Because Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege facts showing that his age motivated the alleged discrimination, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice, but allow Arnold the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dorsey v. District of Columbia Department of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Farrar v. RourkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Gezahey v. Greater Washington Oncology associates/american Oncology NetworkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Guisbert v. Washington Convention and Sports AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Harrington v. Secretary of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.