Legal Opinion

In Re Microsoft I-V Cases

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 2006No. A109057PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARCHIANO, P. J.

Objector and appellant Charles Q. Jakob objected to the trial court’s final approval of a billion-dollar settlement agreement reached in these consolidated class actions against defendant and respondent Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft). He contends that the court erred in rejecting his objections to the settlement agreement’s provisions for a cy pres distribution of unclaimed settlement funds, and therefore erred in its final judgment approving the settlement agreement. We affirm because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining the cy pres provisions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Hypertouch, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API