Legal Opinion
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 2010No. A124038, A124048PublishedCited by 15 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
This is a consolidated appeal in one of several coordinated class actions that challenge wireless telephone carriers’ imposition of early termination fees (ETF’s) on customers seeking to cancel cellular telephone contracts. The defendant/respondent in this proceeding is Célico Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon). The case against Verizon (White v. Cellco Partnership (2008, No. RG04137699) (White)) proceeded to jury trial on June 16, 2008, in the Alameda County Superior Court on the claims of California class members. On July 8, 2008, after…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Continental Illinois Securities Litigation v. Continental Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Marshall v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thompson v. Automobile Club of Southern California CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Golba v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Litwin v. iRenew Bio Energy Solutions, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Loretz v. Regal Stone, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Choi v. RestainoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.