Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Bowman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1984No. Civ. 67929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Defendant and appellant Robert Bowman (Bowman) appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent John McIntosh (McIntosh), on the ground that he was improperly denied his right to a jury trial.
We affirm the judgment.
Facts
McIntosh, a fireman contemplating retirement after 18 years service, wanted to augment his prospective pension by a secure investment. He was advised by Bowman, his former commanding officer, to withdraw his savings, liquidate his securities, and borrow additional money from the Fireman’s Credit Union to enter into a limited partnership, which was to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gonzales v. NorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- March v. PettisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Tyler v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Martin v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hospitality Furniture, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.